Former Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky argued that the nature of any pause in the war with Iran will be crucial in determining whether it empowers or undermines the prospects of regime change in Tehran.
Sharansky explained, If a ceasefire can demonstrate the regime’s weakness while maintaining international pressure it could create conditions for internal change.
When a government’s actions cause harm beyond its borders, the tension between sovereignty and intervention becomes a complex issue that can result in chaos. The best implementation of regime change is through the will of the good people of Iran. Iran’s nefarious activities can no longer be tolerated when for nearly 46 years their actions intentionally and consistently produce death and destruction in Israel and throughout the world. This #1 state sponsor of terror cannot be trusted to change its evil ways either, hence it makes the argument for regime change that much more compelling. The challenge is before the Iranian people.