Open post

“Nuclear Dust” is Key Condition to End War

The Trump administration is considering a plan to move nuclear materials out of Iran. The goal is to remove the nuclear threat once and for all, The Wall Street Journal reported Monday morning. President Donald Trump has not yet decided whether to give the order, but he is said to be open to the idea because it could help achieve his main goal of stopping Iran from ever developing a nuclear weapon.

Before Israel and the United States carried out a series of airstrikes on Iran in June last year, the country was believed to have a large stockpile of enriched uranium. According to international estimates, Iran had more than 400 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60%, along with nearly 200 kilograms enriched to 20%.

Uranium enriched to 60% is already very close to weapons-grade, which is about 90%. Experts say this means the material could be further refined into nuclear weapons relatively quickly.

The 20% enriched uranium is also important because it can be more easily turned into higher-grade material, making it another key part of Iran’s nuclear stockpile.

AFSI’s take:
The demand for uranium, or “nuclear dust,” is strategically sound, as preventing Iran from reconstituting a nuclear program is a valid objective. The diplomatic approach, wherein Iran voluntarily surrenders the material, is significantly more desirable but is contingent upon negotiations that have not yet officially commenced. Should the option of forced extraction be pursued, it would constitute one of the most intricate and perilous military operations in recent US history. If this objective is accomplished, the question arises as to how Iran’s leadership can be definitively prevented from recommencing the construction of a nuclear weapon. We posit that the current regime will perpetually strive to achieve nuclear capability. Our aspiration is for their complete removal and replacement with a government that will — in the words of Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi at the recent CPAC conference — substitute the slogan “Death to Israel” with “G-d Bless Israel.”

Source:
Trump’s Secret Plan to Extract Iran’s Enriched Uranium, by David Israel/The Jewish Edition

 

Open post

Terrorism Support Continues

Yesha Council, the umbrella organization of Jewish municipal councils in Judea and Samaria, accused Ramallah Governor Laila Ghannam of holding support meetings with multiple released terrorists, including several freed in recent prisoner deals, and said these visits reflect the Palestinian Authority’s ongoing glorification of terrorism.

According to evidence published by the council, Ghannam has recently held a series of meetings with many convicted terrorists, some involved in deadly or attempted attacks against Israelis.

The Yesha Council stressed that documentation of the meetings appeared on Ghanam’s official Facebook page.

AFSI’s take:
This report serves as evidence that too many aspects of terrorism still need to be completely eliminated.

Source:
Yesha Council: Ramallah Governor Held Terrorist Support Meetings, by Kostis Konstantinou /TPS-IL, March 30, 2026

 

Open post

Defending the Border

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a situational assessment on Sunday at the IDF Northern Command with Defense Minister Israel Katz, IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, and division commanders.

In remarks after the meeting, the Prime Minister said Israel is currently engaged in a “multi-arena campaign,” adding that Israeli forces are “striking with immense force against Iran and its proxies.” “We are achieving great accomplishments, achievements that are creating visible cracks in the terrorist regime in Tehran,” he said.

He stressed that Israel has shifted its operational posture. “Instead of them surprising us, we are surprising them. We are the ones taking action we are the ones attacking, we are the ones taking the initiative, and we are deep within their territory,” Netanyahu said.

According to Netanyahu, Israel has also redefined its security doctrine, establishing multiple security zones beyond its borders.

The expansion in Lebanon, he said, is intended “to finally thwart the threat of invasion and to push the anti-tank missile fire away from our border.”

AFSI’s take:
Netanyahu aims to change the security dynamics at Israel’s northern border; Establishing an ample security or buffer zone is a necessary element of achieving this.

Source:
Netanyahu in northern Israel: ‘We are expanding the security zone in Lebanon’, by Uzi Baruch/Israel National News, March 29, 2026

 

Open post

Iran Cries Unfair

Following earlier reports of Iranian dissatisfaction with the US proposal to end the war, a senior Iranian official described Tehran’s initial reaction to Washington’s war-ending proposal – transmitted through Pakistan – as “one-sided and unfair,” Reuters reported Thursday, while leaving open the prospect of a diplomatic breakthrough should the US adopt a more realistic approach.

The official disclosed to Reuters that the document “was reviewed in detail on Wednesday night by senior Iranian officials and the representative of Iran’s Supreme Leader.”

“In brief, the proposal suggests that Iran would relinquish its ability to defend itself in exchange for a vague plan to lift sanctions,” the official told Reuters.

The official acknowledged there was “still no arrangement for negotiations, and no plan for talks appears realistic at this stage,” even as Turkey and Pakistan continued pressing forward with efforts to “establish common ground between Iran and the United States and reduce differences.”

AFSI’s take:
As Trump persists in seeking a diplomatic resolution, officials from Israel and the West, although not taken aback by Iran’s dismissal, are closely monitoring for an opportunity for an individual within the Iranian regime to emerge to engage in negotiations prior to the government’s complete collapse.

Source:
Iran rejects US war-ending plan as ‘unfair’, by Adi Nirman and Or Shaked/Israel Hayom, March 26, 2026

 

 

Open post

Liberman: The Threat is Real

Two members of the Knesset have sounded the alarm in recent days over the potential for a massacre in Judea and Samaria reminiscent of the October 7 atrocities, urging community leaders to strengthen their preparedness.

In a letter, sent earlier this week, Liberman said Palestinian Authority police forces are undergoing training resembling specialized army units. He warned that these forces are focusing their resources on gathering intelligence on Israeli army installations and Jewish communities in the region, rather than actively combating terror groups such as Hamas.

Separately, during a Knesset speech on Tuesday, Likud MK Avichai Buaron warned that the “Palestinian Authority has trained 60,000 fighters for invasion and attack,” referencing a report from Regavim.

AFSI’s take:
Preserving a strong Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria is seen as essential to preventing another October 7, based on the belief that vulnerability invites attack while rooted communities deter it. Judea and Samaria residents are viewed as living under constant threat from Palestinian terrorists, showing daily resilience and vigilance. While critics argue the issue is more complex, our perspective holds that presence itself is a critical form of protection. Of course we would prefer to see Sovereignty; but short of that, the growing presence of strong Jewish communities, both new and established, in Judea and Samaria must be applauded.

Source:
MK warn of Oct. 7th-style massacre in Judea and Samaria, by World Israel News Staff, March 25, 2026

 

Open post

MK Katz: The IDF is There

Twenty-six years after the Israel Defense Forces were ordered to withdraw from the longtime security buffer established in southern Lebanon, Defense Minister Israel Katz announced Tuesday the IDF will remain in the area south of the Litani River.

“The IDF will continue to operate in Lebanon with full force against Hezbollah,” Katz said during a situation assessment with top military and defense brass held at the IDF’s Kirya Headquarters in Tel Aviv.

“The principle is clear: Terror and missiles means no houses and no residents, and the IDF is there,” Katz emphasized.

“Hezbollah made a serious mistake when it attacked Israel as a tool of the Iranian terrorist regime, and it is paying and will pay a heavy price.”

AFSI’s take:
This represents a notable change in stance, illustrating the extent to which the strategic landscape has evolved since Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon in 2000. At that time, the decision to withdraw was influenced by a combination of domestic exhaustion and the perception that ending the occupation would alleviate tensions—particularly with Hezbollah. However, in practice, Hezbollah occupied the void, solidified its military presence, and significantly increased its rocket capabilities. Several important points are indicated here: 1. Emphasis on deterrence rather than engagement. 2. A direct challenge to the existing status quo established by UN resolutions. 3. This raises the potential for escalation yet may be intended to avert a larger conflict. 4. Additionally, it serves as a form of political communication.

Source:
After 26 Years, IDF Reclaims Buffer Zone in Southern Lebanon, by Hana Levi Julian/The Jewish Edition, March 24, 2024

 

Open post

Surprised, Not Surprised

Israel was not surprised by U.S. President Donald Trump’s announcement of “good and productive talks” with Iran and his decision to suspend, for five days, a threat to strike Iranian energy infrastructure, Israeli officials said Monday.

Israeli officials said that behind the scenes, intensive contacts have been underway between Washington and Tehran, both directly and through mediation by Qatar and Turkey, aimed at reaching a deal.

According to those officials, a potential framework under discussion would see Iran allow the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz in an initial phase, with the United States refraining from attacking Iranian power plants. A broader ceasefire would be pursued in a second stage.

Israel had supported the option of a large-scale strike on Iranian energy infrastructure, despite the expectation that Iran would retaliate against similar targets in Israel. However, a diplomatic official said Israel is expected to align with Trump’s decisions.

Officials said Trump has not removed the military option but rather paused it to allow time for negotiations, with the primary goal of securing the reopening of the strategic waterway and creating conditions to end the war.

AFSI’s take:
Iran has refuted claims regarding these discussions, whereas Trump asserts that they have engaged in conversations with an individual of considerable influence in Iran. Although the conflict is not concluded, it is undergoing continuous development. At the very least, the topic of de-escalation is starting to be addressed. Next steps will tell If the regime in Iran remains in the hands of IRGC-affiliated extremists and whether or not the Iranian people will experience freedom. Whatever happens will determine Israel’s future.

Source:
Israel ‘not surprised, going along’ with Trump on Iran talks, officials say, by Itamar Eichner/Ynetnews, March 23, 2026

 

Open post

Here is the Difference

At least 60 people were wounded on Saturday in an Iranian ballistic cluster missile attack on the southern Israeli city of Dimona. A few hours later, the Negev city of Arad also came under missile fire, with a direct hit on a central residential neighborhood. At least 115 people were wounded, including 10 with serious injuries, but miraculously there were no deaths.

The rockets hit nine residential buildings, but many others were also damaged, including a Leumit Medical Clinic, the Avishur Elementary School and the Arad Mall. Rescue workers declared a mass casualty event.

Iranian missile fragments — including a huge warhead that damaged multiple homes and surrounding buildings — rained down on multiple sites in Dimona. A seven-story building was struck, and multiple vehicles were set ablaze.

Most of the victims were hurt while racing for shelter, although some had shrapnel injuries and others suffered severe anxiety.

The attacks came after a long day of Iranian missile fire aimed mostly at central and northern Israel, with some of the attacks coordinated with Tehran’s proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah.

AFSI’s take:
Iran’s aim is a multi-front assault to intentionally target and hurt the Israeli population. Israel focuses on targeting Iranian sites to eradicate the terrorist infrastructure. See the difference?

Source:
Negev Under Fire: 60 Injured in Dimona Missile Attack, 115 Wounded in Arad, by Hana Levi Julian, March 21, 2026

 

Open post

Are They Listening?

“Hello, how are you? Is this Commander Fathi Zadeh?” the Israeli Mossad agent asks at the start of the phone call.

“Who are you? Hello?” the senior Iranian police officer responds.

“Are you listening?” the Israeli intelligence agent continues in Farsi. “We know everything about you, you are on our blacklist, and we have all the information about you.”

“OK,” the Iranian officer, identified as Mohsen Fathi Zadeh, head of the Protection and Intelligence Organization of the Law Enforcement Forces (LEF) of Iran, replies in the recording.

The Israeli agent continues: “Your daughter’s name is Zahara, and your wife’s name is Jahanbachsh, your mother’s name is Nadia, and your father’s name is Husain. I called to warn you in advance that you should stand with your people’s side. And if you will not do that, your destiny will be as your leader’s [Ayatollah Ali Khamenei]. Is that clear?

“Brother,” the Iranian commander responds, “I swear on the Quran I’m not your enemy I’m a dead man already; just please come help us and cut off the head of all of the commanders.”

The call, a recording of which was sent to JNS by Israeli intelligence sources, was one of hundreds that Israeli Mossad agents made to senior Iranian security officials since the outbreak of the war on Feb. 28, in an effort to weaken the regime and its supporters.

“This reveals the extent of the Israeli penetration into the Iranian governmental system,” IDF Brig. Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, an intelligence and security expert, told JNS on Sunday. “It is part and parcel of Israel’s goal to weaken the Iranian regime to create the condition for the Iranian people to change it.”

“There is no doubt that this is weakening the regime, but it is too early to say if this will do the job,” Kuperwasser said. “It is hard to determine at what point the regime is so weak that the people will rise up against it. Time will tell.”

AFSI’s take:
With a significantly weakened regime and no single person designated as the leader of Iran, it is time for the remaining officials to confront reality. The brutal civilization they created must come to an end.

Source:
Mossad is calling senior Iranian commanders and pressuring them to stand aside, by Etgar Lefkovits/JNS, March 22, 2026

 

Open post

Top Two Down, Another on Shaky Ground

Israel eliminated Iran’s de facto leader, Supreme National Security Council chief Ali Larijani, and the head of the country’s feared Basij paramilitary police, Gholamreza Soleimani in a wave of airstrikes carried out overnight Monday night.

Dozens of Israeli Air Force warplanes attacked Iranian intelligence centers and command headquarters in the strikes, which also eliminated Soleimani’s deputy, and Islamic Jihad’s Number Two, Akram al-Ajouri.

“The completed strikes are part of an ongoing effort focused on deepening the damage to the Iranian terror regime’s core systems and weakening its capacity to threaten the State of Israel,” the IDF noted.

Rumors swirling today say that as Iran’s political order fractures from within, President Masoud Pezeshkian is said to be weighing resignation, a move that would effectively surrender what remains of the civilian government to the Revolutionary Guards.

Sources close to the Iranian presidency say Pezeshkian has spoken privately of “handing over the keys,” a stark euphemism for stepping down, amid mounting evidence that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps engineered or permitted the death of Ali Larijani, a senior statesman seen as a potential post-Khamenei power broker and a figure to whom Pezeshkian was personally close.

AFSI’s take:
In spite of this latest significant takedown of Iran’s two top leaders, the total collapse of the regime has not yet happened. If Pezeshkian voluntarily steps down that’s a blow to the regime too. Nevertheless, the continuous removal of high-ranking political and security officials may exacerbate divisions within Iran’s leadership and its overall military framework, consequently increasing the chances of wider destabilization.

Sources:
IDF Eliminates Iran’s De Facto Ruler Ali Larijani and Tehran’s Feared Basij Chief, by Hana Levi Julian/The Jewish Edition, March 17, 2026

Iran’s Pezeshkian Weighs Resignation Amid IRGC Conspiracy Theories, by Jfeed Staff, March 18, 2026

Posts navigation

1 2 3 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 211 212 213
Scroll to top